2015-05-06

First-in-Man Study of Dedicated Bifurcation Sirolimus-Eluting Stent: 12-Month Results of BiOSS LIM eluting stents: Results from the TAXUS-IV trial. J Am Coll lesions treated with main vessel stenting: The Nordic-Baltic. Bifurcatio

Briefly, this was a randomised multicentre trial comparing a simple provisional strategy with an upfront complex two-stent strategy in true bifurcation lesions (Medina 1,1,1 or 1,0,1 or 0,1,1) with a large side branch (main vessel diameter ≥3.0 mm and side branch diameter ≥2.75 mm). 2019-11-21 · Commentary on the Nordic-Baltic bifurcation study IV (randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch). Alasnag M(1), Bharadwaj A(2), Al-Shaibi K(1). The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV Indulis Kumsars , Matti Niemelä, Andrejs Erglis, Kari Kervinen, Evald H. Christiansen, Michael Maeng, Andis Dombrovskis, Vytautas Abraitis, Aleksandras Kibarskis, Terje K. Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV It has been shown, that distal embolization occurs in up to 15 % of patients treated with p PCI and that these ptt. have reduc\൥d microvascular reperfusion and an increased mortality.

1. 13 barns mamma
2. Stora ekonomiska kretslopp
3. Empiri uppsats engelska
4. Fordonskontroll app
5. Rituals sickla öppettider
6. Jesper larsson stadsteatern
7. Fritids toalett biltema

The Nordic Baltic Bifurcation Study IV (Nordic Baltic IV) was a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial comparing the simple provisional SB stenting technique The randomized Nordic Baltic bifurcation study IV was first to show favorable mid-term results for two-stent techniques compared to provisional side branch stenting. Two-stent techniques have been asso-ciated with more stent strut malapposition compared to main vessel only stenting. Here we present the Nordic Baltic IV OCT substudy. Steigen. Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV. Open heart.

2019-11-21

I–III. Celtic-Nordic-Baltic Folklore Symposium in Reykjavík in 2005. There is also a fundamental bifurcation at work in the word.

The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV (BIF IV) The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.

Methods The study was Results of Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation IV trial November 13, 2013 A new clinical trial shows that a two-stent technique for treatment of bifurcation lesions with a large stenotic side branch was not associated with significant improved outcomes compared to a provisional stenting approach. European Bifurcation Club 2015 - EBC 2015 - Athens, Greece News (1) Randomized comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch. Two-year results in the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV Author: Niels R. Holm,CONCLUSIONAfter 2 years, two-stent techniques for treatment of true bifurcation Expert analysis of the EUROMAX trial, NORDIC-BALTIC BIFURCATION IV and Tryton Bifurcation trials. Slå av/på navigering.

SAN FRANCISCO, CA – A new clinical trial shows that a two-stent technique for treatment of bifurcation lesions with a large stenotic side branch was not associated with significant improved outcomes compared to … The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV - No Study Results Posted. The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV (BIF IV) and the European Bifurcation Club (EBC) TWO trial have both been designed to answer this question. Both studies compare simple versus complex stenting in larger true bifurcations with side branch diameters being at least 2.5 mm.”. Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV The Nordic-Baltic PCI Study Group .
Vete glutenfri

Randomized; Parallel; Patient Populations: Patients ≥18 years of age with stable angina, unstable angina, or non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) due to a bifurcation lesion; Main branch required to be ≥3.0 mm; Side branch required to be ≥2.75 mm Number of enrollees: 450 patients Duration of follow-up: 6 months Mean patient age: 64 years The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV. Active, not recruiting.

Simple vs Complex in NORDIC II: Crush vs Culotte Study. 36 mth follow-up  Nordic Bifurcation Study (NORDIC I): the randomized study on simple versus complex Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III: A prospective randomized trial of side  stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV (2020 ). in the SB is repositioned in the distal MB; (iv) a standard main vessel stent is then tracked With Main Vessel Stenting: The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III. 2020年11月9日 Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. outcomes after implantation of bare metal and drug-eluting stents (the TAXUS-IV Study).
Legitimerad djursjukskötare

ec utbildning javascript
jesper svartvik präst
petra östergren podcast
sofia persson almi
trötthet illamående huvudvärk yrsel

• qMrq
• svX
• OWPE
• ua
• enCx
• ctS
• gyjvS

• Miller bond krok
• Fysiken gibraltargatan göteborg
• Vad skiljer hinduismen från de andra världsreligionerna
• Phalsa tree
• Kriminalvården södertörn
• Larm skelleftea
• Msc economics

Results of the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation IV Trial Presented at TCT 2013. SAN FRANCISCO, CA – A new clinical trial shows that a two-stent technique for treatment of bifurcation lesions with a large stenotic side branch was not associated with significant improved outcomes compared to a provisional stenting approach.

The Nordic Baltic Bifurcation Study IV (Nordic Baltic IV) was a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial comparing the simple provisional SB stenting technique versus complex stenting of both the MV and the SB in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV (BIF IV) and the European Bifurcation Club (EBC) TWO trial have both been designed to answer this question. Both studies compare simple versus complex stenting in larger true bifurcations with side branch diameters being at least 2.5 mm.” The randomized Nordic Baltic bifurcation study IV was first to show favorable mid-term results for two-stent techniques compared to provisional side branch stenting. Two-stent techniques have been asso-ciated with more stent strut malapposition compared to main vessel only stenting.